Quickly find and visualize default keyboard shortcuts for Avid Pro Tools 9, 10, 11, 12, 2018 and First. For Generic PC keyboards, and for English, UK English and International English Mac keyboards with or without a numeric keypad. How to use:. Click on a shortcut category on the left, then hover over a function on the right. Alternatively, enter a keyword into the search input field, and hover over the search results. You can close the search result window with the escape key or by clicking outside its boundaries. The appropriate keyboard shortcut will light up.

1. Reaper Pro Tools Key Commands For Logic 9 64

Commit to memory!Tooltips.

There are countless threads on the REAPER forum from current and former Pro Tools users about configuring REAPER to be exactly like Pro Tools. Kenny Gioia said this in a recent thread and it’s just too perfect:I know it’s hard. But making REAPER behave like Pro Tools is like trying to get your Porsche to behave like your Honda Civic.You’ll be missing out on so much of what REAPER does better. Kenny GioiaPeople will spend months trying to make things the same flawed, broke, workaround way that Pro Tools does most things and don’t even consider that there might be better and faster ways, or simply investing the time to learn or invent new ways to do these tasks.Discussion open. September 24, 2015 at 12:53 pmI really hate getting on lists like this and preaching to the choir, patting the collective self on the back and all, but I did try to get it to “ProTool” for a long time. It wasn’t until I quit that it started to make sense and I found out how much better it was. That takes a while.

There needs to be a proper transition tool.At one point I nearly convinced the department to switch completely over even after they had the Digi hardware, but it’s too bug a jump at first, when something extant is “good enough”.Good enough is the mortal enemy of good.On the other hand, the switch is happening all over the place in UK academia finally. But on the other hand again, it’s mostly the instructors that are making the switch. The undergrads are (mostly) still being taught PT. September 24, 2015 at 2:58 pmI think a lot of this “why can’t Reaper work like Pro Tools” is due to the fact that Pro Tools has a set way of working, whereas Reaper is built to be very flexible–you often can find a number of different ways to do something. If you are just trying to pick up Reaper and use it, this can be a liability–you need to spend time learning how to make it work for you, and not just a little time, it really is a major re-learning curve. If all you want to do is finish a particular project, learning a whole new DAW that operates very differently is probably not on your “to do” list.What I and other commenters have wanted to see, is a set of pre-sets that, when implemented, make Reaper behave much like Pro Tools with pretty much the same set of commands. This should not be that hard to do, and would really assist long-time PT users in transitioning to Reaper.

And since it would just be some pre-sets that could be modified or discarded, there would be no loss of the flexibility and customizability that is unique to Reaper.We should also recognize that part of what drives people away from Pro Tools and towards Reaper is Avid’s business model that makes the user pay for unwanted upgrades and planned obsolesence–now especially, it feels like you are just renting the software, and next year will have to pay again. I happen to like the way Pro Tools works and always have–it suits my production style for the gigs I usually do. It is Avid’s greed-driven business model that has pushed me into using Reaper, even though I have found the learning curve involved to be a little frustrating at times.

September 24, 2015 at 4:33 pmAh, ProTools. How I hate thee.let me count the ways.Seriously, tho- you do have to understand that, like it or not, it is still the industry “standard”, although that sentiment is fading. What’s always struck me about this problem (moving from one DAW to another) is that the predominance of engineers are really not all that technical as far as computers are concerned. It’s really not in their job description to be so, and I can’t blame them- but from that standpoint and the standpoint of the ubiquity of PT in the industry, I do see that the complaints from these types of users is based largely on not knowing that there are actually other ways to do things. PT’s workflow is extremely rigid and unyielding, in stark contrast to Reaper- who’s workflow is whatever you want it to be. While to many of us, that is what attracts us to it, the rest of the world sees that as “too much work” or “too complicated” and we have this unending argument that is fruitless at best.The truth of the matter is also somewhat subjective.

Installing Windows 95 in DOSBox. An easy step-by-step guide to follow. Verify that the disk is already formatted using fdisk. Extract the contents of the Windows 95 installation disc (win95_en.iso) using WinRAR. Make a new directory called WIN95 in C:/ which is your empty hard disk image. We will later copy the entire content of folder WIN95 from Windows 95 installation disk here. 24) File Transfer Methods. I will discuss two methods for accomplishing file transfer between your virtual hard drive and your host file system. 25) Boot into DOS. 26) Change to your C: Drive. 27) Enter the Windows 95 CD. 28) Installing Windows 95. 29) Follow the Prompts. 30) Directory Choice. 31) Setup Options. Feb 19, 2014 - 15 min - Uploaded by dcoates14Here is a guide on how to install Windows 95 in DosBox SVN. I also provide a solution to the. Dec 14, 2013 - 13 min - Uploaded by dosbox95All files necessary to complete the installation, as well as additional details are available.

I run Reaper in my studio (I also run Studio One as well from time to time) and a lot of the other studios I work in use only PT. I find that PT is very difficult to use, and yet I watch other engineers just fly on it. I guess it’s really chalked up to whatever you use more often.I do agree with Robert Auld’s assessment that what would truly set Reaper apart is for someone to come up with a set of menus, shortcuts and toolbars to get PT users closer to what they are familiar with from the outset. That would most likely help, but there will be differences even then- and, as Reaper enthusiasts (I consider myself more of an evangelist) we need to stop bickering with the PT community and just help them out. John did a fabulous job of that in a recent Reaper Blog post with helping a PT user overcome some of his fears about Reaper- we should do more of that.For now, I’ll just continue to carry my portable versions on USB sticks and when I go to other studios, I just start Reaper up from that and watch my client’s eyes boggle. It’s actually very enjoyable!

Tristan Young September 24, 2015 at 5:20 pmEverything I’ve read about ProTools on the net has pretty much scared me away from it. If I had started with ProTools, and later tried Reaper, I’d be asking why ProTools can’t be like Reaper. Reaper just makes sense to me. Reaper wasn’t my first DAW.

I’ve used many different systems, and while each have their pros and cons, they just don’t hold up to Reaper.Now if we could only get a decent chord browser to help with chord progression. I forget which DAW has a wicked chord browser, I remember seeing a review of it perhaps a couple of months ago.

Reaper Pro Tools Key Commands For Logic 9 64

September 25, 2015 at 6:11 amI just started to migrating to Reaper from pro tools. Frank Arena September 25, 2015 at 3:07 pmI am still new to mixing and recording so when I was looking for a DAW, I asked people what I should choose. There were a lot of Pro Tools due to the “standard” but the price put me off and the fact that I needed special hardware requirements and even an iLok to try out the software made me just say “no”. I never got familiar with what seems to be a piece of software that is not as good as it claims to be. I then tried Ableton Live since a lite version came with my interface. It was OK but limited me on what I wanted to do (8 tracks). Upgrading that was a butt load of money as well.

I came across a video from Ryan “Fluff” Bruce talking about home recording on a budget and how he used Reaper to start with. I began to research this DAW finding great info from many places which in turn led me here to this blog.

I was able to trial the software for free in which I GLADLY paid the $60 to legitimately own. Love what it can do and I am ever finding ways to utilize all of its abilities. RuSa October 29, 2015 at 5:16 pmPT workflow is “old school” and PT business model (as those of many others) is just unfair and ridiculous in my view.

Moreover, Reaper has 1) a much more logical workflow approach 2) much better system stability 3) much more flexibility in every respect while having 4) the same features and possibilities. I am using REAPER in major productions (especially in the classical world) and I am not connected or related to the company in any way – but I wish the philosophy of Reaper took over the “industry standard” for the above mentioned reasons. Diomar May 11, 2016 at 11:51 amEdited!If art and music have always been synonymous with freedom, it means that the way we use for production, recording, mixing, of course, should never be dictated only by a standard of the music industry, but we have to admit that Pro Tools is standard because it was a pioneer in digital recording. However, we must be attentive to new technology and new possibilities that can make a big difference and not realize it, because we are stuck with an industry standard.